Individual: Comparison of Project Management Models

Questions/Business/ManagementIndividual: Comparison of Project Management Models
Your company has been using Traditional Project Management (TPM) methods for years, but is now looking into the possibility of adopting agile practices. Your boss has asked you to prepare a paper comparing TPM to agile practices and summarizing the benefits and limitations of each. Write a 5- to 7-page paper including, at a minimum, the following information: Briefly describe the TPM waterfall method. Briefly describe one or more Agile project management approaches. Compare and contrast TPM and Agile methods, emphasizing the strengths and weaknesses of each. Discuss what kind of projects would be more appropriate for TPM approaches and what types would be more appropriate for Agile approaches. Discuss how a project approach is selected for different types of project. Provide an example by selecting an approach for one of the following projects, and explaining your rationale for the selection. Remember to focus on the project approach and not get involved in the technical details of the project. Converting a large enterprise from using IPv4 to IPv6 Managing a Business Process Reengineering (BPR) project to modernize and integrate a major company’s business systems (accounting, sales, logistics, manufacturing, etc.) into an enterprise-wide unified architecture Building a new data center for an international business
I WILL NOT PAY MORE THAN 15 DOLLARS DO NOT RESPOND UNLESS YOUR WILLING TO DO THIS ASSIGNMENT AT THAT PRICE!! IT DOESN’T HAVE TO BE AN ORIGINAL AS WELL

Join now or log in to start viewing answers.
Report DMCA

Megan1B 203 TUTOR Posted 370. Sold 697. Bought 2. Refunded 1. Solution preview:
The waterfall model was first process to be introduced, it is very easy to under***** *** *** ** * waterfall ****** **** ***** **** ** ******** ****** *** **** ***** ****** Basically **** **** ** ***** ** **** *** ***** ******* *** **** ** tentative requirements * ****** ***** ***** ** *** beginning ** **** ***** ** determine ** *** ******* ** ** *** ***** **** *** ******* ** *** ** ******** ** ******* *** *******

Attachments
TPM.docx

Briefly describe the TPM waterfall method
The waterfall model is one which t**** ***** ** succession ** ***** ***** ** * ******* **** ****** ** **** ******** ***** ******** downwards ******* ***** ****** **** waterfall
*** waterfall ***** *** ***** ******* ** ** introduced, ** ** **** **** ** understand *** *** ** * waterfall ****** **** ***** **** ** ******** ****** *** **** ***** ****** Basically **** **** ** ***** ** **** *** ***** ******* *** **** ** tentative requirements * ****** ***** ***** ** *** beginning ** **** ***** ** determine ** *** ******* ** ** *** ***** **** *** ******* ** *** ** ******** ** ******* *** *******
*** waterfall ***** ** **** ** ******** development ******** ** ***** development ** **** ** ******* ******** downwards ***** * waterfall) ******* *** ****** ** conception, initiation, analysis, ******* construction, ******** *** maintenance **** ***** originates ** *** manufacturing *** construction industries
Advantages ** waterfall *****
** **** ***** ** ****** *** **** ** understand *** ***
** ** ** **** ** ****** *** ** *** ******** ** *** ***** *** **** ***** *** ******** deliverables *** * ****** *******
** ** **** ***** ****** *** processed *** ****** *** ** * **** ****** ** *** *******
** Waterfall ***** ***** **** *** ******* ******** ***** requirements *** **** **** understood
Disadvantages ** waterfall *****
** **** ** application ** ** *** testing stage, ** ** **** difficult ** ** **** *** ****** something **** *** *** well-thought *** ** *** ******* *****
** ** ******* ******** ** ******** ***** **** ****** *** **** *****
** **** ******* ** **** *** ********
** *** * **** ***** *** **** *** object-oriented ********
******* ******** *** ** **** ***** ******* management approaches
*** ******** ******* traditional waterfall ******* **** **** ** ***** methodologies ** *** mid-****sThe ***** methodologies **** *** *** ** waterfall ***** **** ** bureaucratic, inflexible, ***** *** inconsistent **** *** **** **** ******** developers ***** *** effective ***
** ***** ******** development methodology **** ** ***** ** ** ***** *** ** ****** * ******* ***** ******** development **** ***** ** frequently perceived ** * methodology; ***** ** ** ** * framework *** ******** ******* ****** **** ******* ***** ** * methodology
******* ** providing ****** ******** descriptions ** *** everything ** ** ** **** ** * ******* ** *** ***** ***** ****** **** ** ** ** **** ** ** *** ***** ******** development **** **** ** *** ** *** **** understanding ** *** **** ** *** ** ***** *** difficulty **** *** presented
***** ******* ** * self-organizing, cross-ftional **** *** ***** **** ** self-organizing ** **** ***** ** ** ******* **** ****** *** ******* ***** ****** **** ** ***** **** ** *** * difficulty **** ** ***** ***** *** ******** **** *** ******* ** *** **** ** * *****
** ****** * **** ** ***** ******* **** ***** ******** ** ****** ** **** * ******* **** **** ** *******
** ***** development, *** ******** ***** **** supported ***** ***** *** ***** *** ** * ***** ******* *** *** ** ******* ** * ***** *** *** ***** assisting **** ******* *** *** ***** ******* ** *** *** *****
*** ***** **** ** ******* ***** ***** ** ***** ******** development; **** ****** *** business, customers ** ****** *** ****** *** **** ****** ******** *** ***** *******
****** ***** development, ***** ***** *** supported ** *** ******** ***** *** ***** ** * ***** ******* *** *** ** ******* ** ** * ***** *** *** ***** ******* **** ******* *** the Scrum ******* ** ******* ** *** ******* ***** *** ******* ***** **** ** *** ***** ***** *** ** ***** ******** development, represents *** business, customers ** ****** *** ****** *** **** ****** ******** *** ***** *******
******* *** ******** *** *** ***** ******** emphasizing *** strengths *** weaknesses ** ****
** Traditional ******* Management, **** **** * ***** **** *** understanding ** *** ******* ** ******* *** ******* **** understood features, requirements *** ******* ***** ** ***** ******* Management, *** ***** ******* requirements *** ***** discovered ** ***** *** ******* ** iteration, ***** therefore ******* *** eliminates ambiguity ***** ***** ******** ***** ** ** ** *** **** ***** ** Traditional, *** ***** *** ******* ** ***** ******** ** ****** **** **** ** Traditional projects, ***** ** * ***** ******** ** ******* munication **** frequently ****** ***** conflicts ***** ***** responsible *** ***** ***** ** ********
Traditional ******* Management ****** ******** **** ** distributed **** ****** ** **** ******* specialist *** ****** ******** ******* ** *** **** ******* requirements *** documentation, ***** ***** ******* **** ***** co-location ** **** ******* ** ***** ** **** ****** *** ******* increments ******* ***** ** ******* preferred *** ******** **** *** ***** ****** **** **** different ** ******** locations *** ***** ** ******* ** ***** **** ******* ** ******* ***** Traditional **** ** **** *** ***** ****** **** ** **** responsibility ** ***** ********
Traditional ******* ******** ****** ******** ******* ******* ******** *** ***** ** **** ***** ** ****** **** *** ******** constraints ** **** *** ***** ** contrast, *** ***** ******* ******* ** **** ******* ** ******** *** ******** ****** ****** *** ******** *** secondary ** ** ******* ** ******* ******* ** adherence ** processes **** *** Traditional ******* *******
***** ******* management strengths *** weaknesses
Strengths
** ******* *** eliminates ******** ** discovering ***** ******* management requirements ** ***** *** ******* ** iteration **** **** discipline ** “Time” *** “Cost”, ******** ****** ******* ** “Features”
Weaknesses
******** *** ****** ** available, **** consortium ******* **** ****** ** ***** ****** ******* **** *** ****** *** ** *** ******
***** co-location ** **** ******* *** ***** ** ***** ** ******* ****** *** ******* increments
Traditional ******* management
**** ******* requirements *** documentation ******** distributed **** ***** ** *******
** ***** ******** * ***** ***** ** *** processes ******** ** achieving *** **** ******* ** ****** **** * ***** *** ** requirement *** documentation
******* **** **** ** ******** ***** ** **** appropriate *** *** approaches *** **** ***** ***** ** **** appropriate *** ***** approaches
*** **** *** *** ** ******** ******* ******* ** ****** *** operating ****** ******* ******* *** ******* ******* *** **** *** ***** ******** ****** * ******** *** ******** *** ******** resources **** *** ** elaborate ** *** ****** management ** ******** ***** **** ** ****** ** *** ******* *** ******* * ****** ******* ******* ***** **** processes *** artifacts *** ******** ** ***** ** ******* * ******* ***** **** ** ******** ******* *** **** *** ******** ******* ** *** stakeholders ** ******* projects, activities ******** ******* **** ****** ** **** management ** **** ** ******* ***** **** ** ****** ** *** ******** ******* *** ******* ******* **** ******* ******** mitigation ********
** conclusion, *** ** * ******* management ******** **** **** **** *** **** ******* *** environments **** ******** **** ******** ***** *** techniques *** management *** ******* ******** ***** ***** *** techniques **** **** ****** *** ******* ** *** **** ** **** ***** *** techniques *** ** accurately predicted According ** ** *** **** appropriate ******** *** ***** *** *** *** **** aggressive deadlines, * **** ****** ** uniqueness ** **** ** **** *** ***** ** ** something **** ** *** ** *** **** ******** ** ** *** something *** **** *** **** ****** **** *** **** **** *** **** ******** doesn’t **** ** ***** ******** ******* ***** **** *** **** **** ** ****** *** ** ***** ******* *** ***** ******* ******** ** ****** * ******* appropriate *** ***** ** ******* *** **** ***** *** iterations ** ** ***** ******** *** ******* ** **** *** intensity *** ***** ***** ** * ******* ** ******* ** ******* ** *** ******** ***** *** ******** ** ***** *** *** ***** ***** factors–urgency, ******** *** plexity–mix ** ******* projects, ******** ** ****** **** ******** ********
***** ******** ** * ****** *** ******** ******** *** notoriously **** **** ******** ******* ** ******* * *** ******** *** ** ******* ****** ***** ** ****** ****** * ***** ** ******* ******** ** ***** situation ***** ** **** ******* ******* ** ***** ******* ***** * **** ***** *** ******* *** ******* ***** ******* ***** *****
***** ** ****** * ******* **** ******** ****** *** ***** **** invitations, *** ** ******** * ******* ***** *** ***** ******* ** **** **** ******* ** ***** ******* ***** **** ** ****** ***** ** ******** **** *** ******** ****** ****** ***** ***** ** appropriate ** *** ****** ******* **** ** important ******* *** ******* *** **** ******** ******** development *** ******** ** **** ***** *** ******** ****** ** ******* * couple’s ***** **** ** *** *** ** ******** ** * ******* ******* **** ** **** ** *** **** ******** *** *** ******* *******
** ******* *** * ******* ******** ** ******** *** different ***** ** *******
** *** ******* management ***** *** ******* approaches *** ******* **** *** ** **** ** ******** different ***** ** ******* *** *** ***** ** ******* methodology *** ** ******* **** traditional *** ****** approaches
Traditional ******** ******** * ******** ** consecutive ****** ** *** ******* management ******* ** ** * **** ******** ****** ** ******* ******* *** ******* * ******* ** ******* ** ******** achieving *** ******** ** implementation ******* *** ******** *** advantage ** milestone-based ******** *** **** ******** ** information technology *** ******** development, **** ****** ** ****** “waterfall”-this ***** *** **** ** **** ******* ***** ******* ****** ********
*** following ****** *** ******** ** *** traditional ******* management methodologyTPM.docx

Briefly describe the TPM waterfall method
The waterfall model is one which t**** ***** ** succession ** ***** ***** ** * ******* **** ****** ** **** ******** ***** ******** downwards ******* ***** ****** **** waterfall
*** waterfall ***** *** ***** ******* ** ** introduced, ** ** **** **** ** understand *** *** ** * waterfall ****** **** ***** **** ** ******** ****** *** **** ***** ****** Basically **** **** ** ***** ** **** *** ***** ******* *** **** ** tentative requirements * ****** ***** ***** ** *** beginning ** **** ***** ** determine ** *** ******* ** ** *** ***** **** *** ******* ** *** ** ******** ** ******* *** *******
*** waterfall ***** ** **** ** ******** development ******** ** ***** development ** **** ** ******* ******** downwards ***** * waterfall) ******* *** ****** ** conception, initiation, analysis, ******* construction, ******** *** maintenance **** ***** originates ** *** manufacturing *** construction industries
Advantages ** waterfall *****
** **** ***** ** ****** *** **** ** understand *** ***
** ** ** **** ** ****** *** ** *** ******** ** *** ***** *** **** ***** *** ******** deliverables *** * ****** *******
** ** **** ***** ****** *** processed *** ****** *** ** * **** ****** ** *** *******
** Waterfall ***** ***** **** *** ******* ******** ***** requirements *** **** **** understood
Disadvantages ** waterfall *****
** **** ** application ** ** *** testing stage, ** ** **** difficult ** ** **** *** ****** something **** *** *** well-thought *** ** *** ******* *****
** ** ******* ******** ** ******** ***** **** ****** *** **** *****
** **** ******* ** **** *** ********
** *** * **** ***** *** **** *** object-oriented ********
******* ******** *** ** **** ***** ******* management approaches
*** ******** ******* traditional waterfall ******* **** **** ** ***** methodologies ** *** mid-****sThe ***** methodologies **** *** *** ** waterfall ***** **** ** bureaucratic, inflexible, ***** *** inconsistent **** *** **** **** ******** developers ***** *** effective ***
** ***** ******** development methodology **** ** ***** ** ** ***** *** ** ****** * ******* ***** ******** development **** ***** ** frequently perceived ** * methodology; ***** ** ** ** * framework *** ******** ******* ****** **** ******* ***** ** * methodology
******* ** providing ****** ******** descriptions ** *** everything ** ** ** **** ** * ******* ** *** ***** ***** ****** **** ** ** ** **** ** ** *** ***** ******** development **** **** ** *** ** *** **** understanding ** *** **** ** *** ** ***** *** difficulty **** *** presented
***** ******* ** * self-organizing, cross-ftional **** *** ***** **** ** self-organizing ** **** ***** ** ** ******* **** ****** *** ******* ***** ****** **** ** ***** **** ** *** * difficulty **** ** ***** ***** *** ******** **** *** ******* ** *** **** ** * *****
** ****** * **** ** ***** ******* **** ***** ******** ** ****** ** **** * ******* **** **** ** *******
** ***** development, *** ******** ***** **** supported ***** ***** *** ***** *** ** * ***** ******* *** *** ** ******* ** * ***** *** *** ***** assisting **** ******* *** *** ***** ******* ** *** *** *****
*** ***** **** ** ******* ***** ***** ** ***** ******** development; **** ****** *** business, customers ** ****** *** ****** *** **** ****** ******** *** ***** *******
****** ***** development, ***** ***** *** supported ** *** ******** ***** *** ***** ** * ***** ******* *** *** ** ******* ** ** * ***** *** *** ***** ******* **** ******* *** the Scrum ******* ** ******* ** *** ******* ***** *** ******* ***** **** ** *** ***** ***** *** ** ***** ******** development, represents *** business, customers ** ****** *** ****** *** **** ****** ******** *** ***** *******
******* *** ******** *** *** ***** ******** emphasizing *** strengths *** weaknesses ** ****
** Traditional ******* Management, **** **** * ***** **** *** understanding ** *** ******* ** ******* *** ******* **** understood features, requirements *** ******* ***** ** ***** ******* Management, *** ***** ******* requirements *** ***** discovered ** ***** *** ******* ** iteration, ***** therefore ******* *** eliminates ambiguity ***** ***** ******** ***** ** ** ** *** **** ***** ** Traditional, *** ***** *** ******* ** ***** ******** ** ****** **** **** ** Traditional projects, ***** ** * ***** ******** ** ******* munication **** frequently ****** ***** conflicts ***** ***** responsible *** ***** ***** ** ********
Traditional ******* Management ****** ******** **** ** distributed **** ****** ** **** ******* specialist *** ****** ******** ******* ** *** **** ******* requirements *** documentation, ***** ***** ******* **** ***** co-location ** **** ******* ** ***** ** **** ****** *** ******* increments ******* ***** ** ******* preferred *** ******** **** *** ***** ****** **** **** different ** ******** locations *** ***** ** ******* ** ***** **** ******* ** ******* ***** Traditional **** ** **** *** ***** ****** **** ** **** responsibility ** ***** ********
Traditional ******* ******** ****** ******** ******* ******* ******** *** ***** ** **** ***** ** ****** **** *** ******** constraints ** **** *** ***** ** contrast, *** ***** ******* ******* ** **** ******* ** ******** *** ******** ****** ****** *** ******** *** secondary ** ** ******* ** ******* ******* ** adherence ** processes **** *** Traditional ******* *******
***** ******* management strengths *** weaknesses
Strengths
** ******* *** eliminates ******** ** discovering ***** ******* management requirements ** ***** *** ******* ** iteration **** **** discipline ** “Time” *** “Cost”, ******** ****** ******* ** “Features”
Weaknesses
******** *** ****** ** available, **** consortium ******* **** ****** ** ***** ****** ******* **** *** ****** *** ** *** ******
***** co-location ** **** ******* *** ***** ** ***** ** ******* ****** *** ******* increments
Traditional ******* management
**** ******* requirements *** documentation ******** distributed **** ***** ** *******
** ***** ******** * ***** ***** ** *** processes ******** ** achieving *** **** ******* ** ****** **** * ***** *** ** requirement *** documentation
******* **** **** ** ******** ***** ** **** appropriate *** *** approaches *** **** ***** ***** ** **** appropriate *** ***** approaches
*** **** *** *** ** ******** ******* ******* ** ****** *** operating ****** ******* ******* *** ******* ******* *** **** *** ***** ******** ****** * ******** *** ******** *** ******** resources **** *** ** elaborate ** *** ****** management ** ******** ***** **** ** ****** ** *** ******* *** ******* * ****** ******* ******* ***** **** processes *** artifacts *** ******** ** ***** ** ******* * ******* ***** **** ** ******** ******* *** **** *** ******** ******* ** *** stakeholders ** ******* projects, activities ******** ******* **** ****** ** **** management ** **** ** ******* ***** **** ** ****** ** *** ******** ******* *** ******* ******* **** ******* ******** mitigation ********
** conclusion, *** ** * ******* management ******** **** **** **** *** **** ******* *** environments **** ******** **** ******** ***** *** techniques *** management *** ******* ******** ***** ***** *** techniques **** **** ****** *** ******* ** *** **** ** **** ***** *** techniques *** ** accurately predicted According ** ** *** **** appropriate ******** *** ***** *** *** *** **** aggressive deadlines, * **** ****** ** uniqueness ** **** ** **** *** ***** ** ** something **** ** *** ** *** **** ******** ** ** *** something *** **** *** **** ****** **** *** **** **** *** **** ******** doesn’t **** ** ***** ******** ******* ***** **** *** **** **** ** ****** *** ** ***** ******* *** ***** ******* ******** ** ****** * ******* appropriate *** ***** ** ******* *** **** ***** *** iterations ** ** ***** ******** *** ******* ** **** *** intensity *** ***** ***** ** * ******* ** ******* ** ******* ** *** ******** ***** *** ******** ** ***** *** *** ***** ***** factors–urgency, ******** *** plexity–mix ** ******* projects, ******** ** ****** **** ******** ********
***** ******** ** * ****** *** ******** ******** *** notoriously **** **** ******** ******* ** ******* * *** ******** *** ** ******* ****** ***** ** ****** ****** * ***** ** ******* ******** ** ***** situation ***** ** **** ******* ******* ** ***** ******* ***** * **** ***** *** ******* *** ******* ***** ******* ***** *****
***** ** ****** * ******* **** ******** ****** *** ***** **** invitations, *** ** ******** * ******* ***** *** ***** ******* ** **** **** ******* ** ***** ******* ***** **** ** ****** ***** ** ******** **** *** ******** ****** ****** ***** ***** ** appropriate ** *** ****** ******* **** ** important ******* *** ******* *** **** ******** ******** development *** ******** ** **** ***** *** ******** ****** ** ******* * couple’s ***** **** ** *** *** ** ******** ** * ******* ******* **** ** **** ** *** **** ******** *** *** ******* *******
** ******* *** * ******* ******** ** ******** *** different ***** ** *******
** *** ******* management ***** *** ******* approaches *** ******* **** *** ** **** ** ******** different ***** ** ******* *** *** ***** ** ******* methodology *** ** ******* **** traditional *** ****** approaches
Traditional ******** ******** * ******** ** consecutive ****** ** *** ******* management ******* ** ** * **** ******** ****** ** ******* ******* *** ******* * ******* ** ******* ** ******** achieving *** ******** ** implementation ******* *** ******** *** advantage ** milestone-based ******** *** **** ******** ** information technology *** ******** development, **** ****** ** ****** “waterfall”-this ***** *** **** ** **** ******* ***** ******* ****** ********Price: $20.00

  • We offer what we promise and unlike others our support staffs are online 24/7. We guarantee money back if you do not get value for your Money.
  • The calculator below shall help you compute your pay for this assignment or any other assignment.
  • WE OFFER 6 HRS URGENT ORDERS AS WELL

Use DISCOUNT CODE DISC15 to enjoy 15% Discount on all orders while at the order page.
Do you need any clarifications ?????????
Contact our support staff ONLINE NOW via the CHAT.

Type of paper Academic level Subject area
Number of pages Paper urgency Cost per page:
 Total: