business research:Barnes and noble

Questions/Business/Managementbusiness research:Barnes and noble
Find three articles relevant to your research problem with a minimum of one being peer-reviewed. Sources of non-peer reviewed articles may be trade journals or other sources recommended by your instructor. Each team member must try to find three separate articles. Provide a brief summary of each article by selecting relevant research that addresses the variables in the research question(s) of the article. You can summarize similar articles together by mentioning and referencing the article in the same paragraph. Use an in-text citation and reference for each article. That is, you can reference the article(s) you are summarizing within the summary and then also include the article(s) in the reference section.

Join now or log in to start viewing answers.
Report DMCA

anu09F 6 TUTOR Posted 76. Sold 28. Solution preview:
As most readers here are aware, the path to publishing a scientific paper has tw* ***** obstacles ****** *** ****** ** * ******* *** ** ****** **** * ***** ** potentially “interesting” ****** *** publication ** ***** ******** ** ** ****** **** threshold, ** ** **** **** *** *** ******* review” ** *** ** **** ****** ****** ** *** ****** *** reviewers **** * remendation ***** ******* ** *** *** ******* ****** ******* *** paper—if **** *** **** *** ******* *** ** **** ** ******** (potentially ***** additional experiments); ** *** ** **** ***** *** ******* *** ** **** ** rejected; ** *** ******* *** ****** *** ****** ***** * ******** **** ** ****** **** ******* ******** * ******* ** ****** ** ***** *** ***** ****** * *** ****** ** * **** *** ******* ** *** ***** ** rejected, *** generally ***** *** **** ****** *** ******** **** **** ****** **** **** ******* *** ** ******** *** **** ******** statement ** *** ****** ****** **** ** ** * **** ******* ** ****** ******* ******* ******* ****** ******* ***** ** summarize, **** ****** ** ****** *** ***** ** **** *** ******* ****** **** correlation ** perceived “publish ability” ** * ***** ******* *** ****** ** reviewers ** ****** ****** **** ****** ineffective ** detecting ******* ****** ******* established ****** *** ******* originality, *** sometimes ****** *** **** reviewers *** ***** ***** **** ****** **** ****** ** ***** *** publication ** petitors)

Attachments
Business Research Barnes & Noble.docx
The publishing process as it stands currently
As most readers here are aware, th* **** ** publishing * scientific ***** *** *** ***** obstacles ****** *** ****** ** * ******* *** ** ****** **** * ***** ** potentially “interesting” ****** *** publication ** ***** ******** ** ** ****** **** threshold, ** ** **** **** *** *** ******* review” ** *** ** **** ****** ****** ** *** ****** *** reviewers **** * remendation ***** ******* ** *** *** ******* ****** ******* *** paper—if **** *** **** *** ******* *** ** **** ** ******** (potentially ***** additional experiments); ** *** ** **** ***** *** ******* *** ** **** ** rejected; ** *** ******* *** ****** *** ****** ***** * ******** **** ** ****** **** ******* ******** * ******* ** ****** ** ***** *** ***** ****** * *** ****** ** * **** *** ******* ** *** ***** ** rejected, *** generally ***** *** **** ******
*** ******** **** **** ****** **** **** ******* *** ** ******** *** **** ******** statement ** *** ****** ****** **** ** ** * **** ******* ** ****** ******* ******* ******* ****** ******* ***** ** summarize, **** ****** ** ****** *** ***** ** **** *** ******* ****** **** correlation ** perceived “publish ability” ** * ***** ******* *** ****** ** reviewers ** ****** ****** **** ****** ineffective ** detecting ******* ****** ******* established ****** *** ******* originality, *** sometimes ****** *** **** reviewers *** ***** ***** **** ****** **** ****** ** ***** *** publication ** petitors)
** *** ** ******
** *** ** ** ***** **** **** ******* ******* *** **** ****** ***** ***** there’s **** **** ** self-publishing * ***** ****** **** ******** ** * ******** ****** **** ***** ** ****** Precedings), ** ***** ******* * peer-reviewed ******* *** publication ****** ***** * *** ***** ******** ******** ** ******* * ******* ** ***** **** ****** ******* ostensibly ***** ** ******** ** * ******* *** **** ostensibly ****** **** *** ******* ** ** ******** *** ******* *** ***** ****** ** ** replicated ******* ** practice, * ***** ***** ******* **** ** intended)
** ******* **** **** goal–that ** filtering ****** ***** ** ******** ******** ** * ******* *** reproducibility–as *** legitimate ******* ******** ** peer-reviewed ******** **** ******* **** ***** ****** ****** ****** **** *** *** ** achieving **** **** ******** * ******* ** unaccountable, ***** anonymous, reviewers *** ******** *** ***** ** **** **** *** ***** Certainly *** **** ***** ** *** ******** ** * ***** ** *** ****** *** ***** *** ****** ****** ***** *** *** **** ***** ** *** ******* *** reproducibility ** * ***** ** ******* ******* * different ****** **** ******** ***** **** ****** *****
* Immediate publication ******* **** ****** **** ** ****** * ******* ***** **** ******** ******* **** ****** *** addresses *** ****** ** ***** *** **** ** publication
* One-click remendation ** ****** *** ** **** ** **** * *** ** ****** *** ****** ** **** * ******* * **** ** *** ****** ***** *** **** ** ****** ** Facebook); *** ****** *** relatively effective ****** ** ** ***** individuals ** ******* **** **** **** * ***** **** * ****** ***** ******* **** ******* Facebook, ** ******** ** ***** ******* *** ****** ****** ****** *** extremely effective ** **** situations
* Connection ** * ****** ******* ** ******* ** **** ***** * ******* ****** **** ** * *** ** ****** **** * ****** ******** **** * **** ** **** ** ** ****** * ***** **** *** ****** ** ***** ****** ** **** *** **** ****** ****** ** **** ****** variation, * ******* necessarily **** ** * ******** ****** **** * ****** *** * ***** ******** **** * ****** **** ** * ***** ******** ** *** *** colleague *** **** ****** variation ******* *** ******
* Effective ****** ***** ** *** collective ******* ** * ***** **** ****** ***** searching *** *** **** ****** ** * ***** ******** ******* ** *** *** ** *** **** ****** ******** ** ****** ******* ** **** ****** ** **** ** immediately ***** *** *** **** citations * ***** *** received; ** ******** **** ** ****** correlated **** *** ****** ******* ** * ***** **** ****** **** *** *** ******* *** ** ***** **** **** citations ****** ***** **** ** ** **** ** ****** *** relatively ****** literature *** **** ***** ** *** ******** ** ***** * *** *
*** *** ******* additional ***** ** ******** **** ***** ** ****** ** * ****** **** this—ments, ****** ** ***** themselves, encouragement ** reproducible ******** *** ****** ** **** ***** mechanism—but *** ******* ***** *** ******** essential
**** * ****** **** **** perfectly ******* *** ** *** ****** **** **** ****** mentioned ****** ******* ***** ** **** **** **** ** ****** ***** **** ** ******** ****** ******* established ******** ******* **** ** **** ****** ** *** *** *** ***** ******** **** **** ** ****** ***** ********
*** ** ** *** ******
**** ** *** ***** ****** ** ******* *** *** *** ***** *** discussions ** ******* ******* *** **** ** ******** *** ****** **** *** “peer-reviewed journal” ****** *** evaluation ** individuals–that *** **** evaluating ** individual researcher *** * ***** ** ******* *** ******* ** *** ******* ** ***** * ***** ** **** ** published ** ***** **** ** * ***** *** *** ******* ** *** **** ****** ****** **** ** *** *** **** ****** ****** entrenched, *** ** ** obviously *** ******* **** *** publishing ***** ******** ***** **** ** ** ** ***** ****** ** *** *** ****** ****** ******** ******* **** * ***** *** ******* ****** ****** published ** ******* ** ******** *** *** ****
*** ***** ** **** ** **** **** ** ***** ***** ***** ****** ******* ***** ** incorporated **** *** “standard” publishing ***** ******* **** ******* ** ***** ***** ******* ****** ** articles) **** **** implemented ** *** innovative **** journals, *** **** **** ******* **** deafening ***** **** *** ******** ****** *** ** ***** Certainly, ****** partially ******* ***** ******* *** non-trivial ** *** **** **** ** *** ** ** **** *** ****** ***** **** *** **** ** **** * ******* *** **** importantly, there’s ** ***** ** munity—I’ll ***** *** **** **** ** * ****** ** ******** ** ** *** ****** * * ****** ** ** ******* *** there’s ** mechanism ** **** ** **** * ***** ** ***** **** *** ***** ** **** ****** * ***** *** ******* implementations ** ***** ***** ****** ******* ******* *** filtering mechanism **** they’re ******** ** replace–if * *** **** * **** *** ***** ** ****** ****** **** doesn’t **** ** ** **** ****** ******* ***** *** ******
**** situation *** ******* *** ******* ***** *** * ****** app—one **** ****** *** ** ***** ****** *** **** ******** ** **** ***** *** **** ******* **** **** **** **** ***** *** ** **** ****** *** **** ******* ******** ****** identities *** ****** ******** (Google+? Facebook?), **** ******* approximately ** ******** ****** *** **** ** ** ******* ******* **** ** **** ******* *** **** **** *** ****** ** *** ****** **** ******* *** ** ** **** ***** **** * ****** **** **** ******* *** ** *** ** ***** **** ****** ******** ** ***** ****** **** ******* ******* **** ** **** ****** ***** ** *** ****** ** ***** ***** ****** **** *** ******** ** *** ******* ** ***** *** **** ** published, ****** ** additional **** **** ** eliminate *** ******** altogether
ConclusionsPrice: $13.00

  • We offer what we promise and unlike others our support staffs are online 24/7. We guarantee money back if you do not get value for your Money.
  • The calculator below shall help you compute your pay for this assignment or any other assignment.
  • WE OFFER 6 HRS URGENT ORDERS AS WELL

Use DISCOUNT CODE DISC15 to enjoy 15% Discount on all orders while at the order page.
Do you need any clarifications ?????????
Contact our support staff ONLINE NOW via the CHAT.

Type of paper Academic level Subject area
Number of pages Paper urgency Cost per page:
 Total: